Main menu
THE PORTAL
This portal
Ethics
Authors
Keywords
Partners
Initiatives
Terms of usage
RESOURCES
Publications
Books
Training materials
Reports
Most popular
Top downloads
TERMINOLOGY
ABBREVIATIONS
NEWS
CONTACT
Resources
Understanding corruption
Assessing corruption risks
Corruption Indexes
Impact of corruption
Sources of corruption
Norms
Corruption
Conflict of interests
Good governance
PMCs/PSCs
Security Sector Reform
Ethics
Leadership
Vision, Mission, Strategy
Organisational culture
Morale & Cohesion
Gender aspects
Communication
Management
Management and administrative theories
Personnel Management
Financial Management
Procurement
Outsourcing
Utilization
Public-private partnerships
BI Programmes
Measuring results and organizational performance
Integrity strategy
Programme/project management
Examples
SSR & Institution Building
Balanced Scorecards
Operations
Integrity of forces in theatre
SSR & Institution Building
Frozen conflict
Checks and Balances
Modern Defence Institutions
Justice and Law Enforcement
Special Anti-corruption units
Parliamentary oversight
Audit chambers
Ombuds organizations
Access to Information
Media/ Investigative journalists
Civil Society
International organizations
Organisations
Defence/ Military
Intelligence
Special Anti-corruption Units
Police
Border Guards
Financial Intelligence
Defence industry
Education & Training
Integrity education
Courses
Training
I
ntegrity in
D
efence &
S
ecurity
Search form
Search
Login
English
العربية
Հայերեն
azərbaycan
Bosanski
Български
Hrvatski
Français
ქართული
Română
دری
پښتو
Русский
Српски
Español
Українська
desktop
resources
main-menu
Wim F. van Eekelen
The Role of Parliaments and Audit Offices
[Author of box 19.5 is Todor Tagarev]
Follow us on twitter
See our profile on Google plus
Connect with us on LinkedIn
